The Ultimate Guide to Choose LCD and OLED Modules

The world of embedded electronics is visually driven, and selecting the right display module is crucial for any project involving an Arduino, ESP32, STM32, or Raspberry Pi. The choice between a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) and an Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) module, along with the correct interface and features like touch, can significantly impact your project's performance, power consumption, and overall user experience. This guide provides a comprehensive framework for making that critical decision.

LCD vs. OLED: The Fundamental Choice

The first step is understanding the core differences between the two dominant display technologies in the embedded space. The distinction lies in how they generate light. LCDs rely on a separate backlight to illuminate liquid crystals, while OLEDs are self-emissive, meaning each pixel generates its own light. This fundamental difference leads to a host of performance trade-offs.
Feature
LCD (Liquid Crystal Display)
OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode)
Light Source
Requires a constant backlight (e.g., LED)
Self-emissive pixels (no backlight needed)
Contrast Ratio
Moderate (typically 1,000:1 to 5,000:1)
Superior (theoretically infinite, 1,000,000:1+)
Black Levels
Grayish (due to backlight bleed)
True Black (pixels are completely off)
Power Consumption
Constant (backlight is always on)
Variable (very low for dark content, higher for bright white screens)
Response Time
Slower (1ms - 10ms, physical movement)
Extremely Fast (< 0.1ms, electrical)
Viewing Angle
Good, but color/contrast can shift at extreme angles
Excellent (near 180 degrees)
Cost
Generally lower, especially for larger sizes
Higher, but dropping for small modules
Lifespan/Burn-in
Very long lifespan, no burn-in risk
Risk of burn-in with static, bright images

Recommendation: Choose OLED for battery-powered devices, superior image quality, and small status displays where true black is desired. Choose LCD for projects requiring high brightness (e.g., outdoor use), large screen sizes, or where cost is the primary constraint.

Key Selection Criteria: Interface, Size, and Touch

Beyond the display technology itself, three critical factors—the communication interface, the physical size, and the presence of a touch layer—will dictate your final module choice.

1. Communication Interface

Interface
Wires (Approx.)
Speed
Best For
Microcontroller Suitability
I2C (Two-Wire Interface)
2 (SDA, SCL)
Slow
Small, low-resolution status displays (e.g., 128x32 OLED, 16x2 LCD)
Arduino, ESP32, STM32, RPi
SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface)
4-5 (MOSI, SCK, CS, DC, RST)
Fast
Color TFTs, high-refresh-rate graphics, larger monochrome OLEDs
ESP32, STM32, RPi, Arduino (faster than I2C)
Parallel (8-bit/16-bit)
8-16+
Very Fast
High-resolution, high-frame-rate displays, complex UIs
STM32 (due to dedicated parallel bus), ESP32
HDMI/DSI
N/A
Extremely Fast
High-resolution video output
Raspberry Pi (SBCs)

2. Screen Size and Resolution

The physical size of the display is often a trade-off between project footprint and information density.
  • Small (0.96" to 2.4"): Ideal for wearables, small sensors, and status indicators. Typically use I2C or SPI. Resolution is low (e.g., 128x64).
  • Medium (2.8" to 5.0"): Suitable for handheld devices, simple control panels, and portable instruments. Almost always use SPI or Parallel. Resolution ranges from 240x320 to 800x480.
  • Large (7.0" and up): Best for fixed control panels, desktop monitors, and complex HMI applications. Often use HDMI or DSI (for Raspberry Pi) or high-speed Parallel/RGB interfaces (for STM32/ESP32). Resolution is typically 800x480 or higher.

3. Touch Screen Technology: Resistive vs. Capacitive

For interactive projects, a touch screen is essential. The two main types, resistive and capacitive, offer distinct advantages.
Feature
Resistive Touch (RTP)
Capacitive Touch (CTP)
Mechanism
Pressure-based (two layers touch)
Electrical field-based (uses conductivity)
Clarity
Lower (due to multiple layers and air gap)
Higher (clearer glass surface)
Input
Stylus, glove, finger, or any object
Bare finger or specialized capacitive stylus
Multi-Touch
Generally single-touch only
Supports multi-touch (gestures, pinch-to-zoom)
Durability
Softer surface, prone to scratches
Harder glass surface, more durable
Cost
Lower cost
Higher cost
Recommendation: Use Resistive for industrial environments, applications requiring glove use, or when cost is paramount. Use Capacitive for modern, smartphone-like user interfaces, multi-touch gestures, and superior visual clarity.

Platform-Specific Recommendations (Waveshare Examples)

The best display choice is heavily dependent on the capabilities and limitations of your chosen platform. All examples below are based on products available from Waveshare.

1. Arduino (Uno, Nano)

  • Best Fit: Small, low-resolution displays.
  • Example: 0.96inch OLED Module (I2C/SPI) [Source: Waveshare]
  • Reasoning: The limited RAM and speed of classic Arduino boards are best suited for small, simple displays. The I2C interface minimizes pin usage.

2. ESP32 (WROOM, ESP32-S3)

  • Best Fit: High-speed, colorful, and interactive displays.
  • Example: 3.5inch Resistive Touch Display (SPI) [Source: Waveshare]
  • Reasoning: The ESP32's fast SPI bus and ample memory can easily drive medium-sized color TFTs. Resistive touch is a cost-effective way to add interaction.

3. STM32 (Nucleo, Discovery Boards)

  • Best Fit: Professional-grade user interfaces and high-resolution displays.
  • Example: 7inch Capacitive Touch LCD (Parallel/RGB) [Source: Waveshare]
  • Reasoning: STM32 microcontrollers often feature dedicated display controllers (like LTDC) that excel at driving large, high-resolution displays via fast parallel interfaces, enabling complex UIs with capacitive multi-touch.

4. Raspberry Pi (Zero, 4, 5)

  • Best Fit: High-resolution desktop environments or small status monitors.
  • Example: 7inch DSI Capacitive Touch Display [Source: Waveshare]
  • Reasoning: For the Raspberry Pi, DSI and HDMI are the preferred interfaces for large displays, offering the best performance for the Linux desktop environment. Capacitive touch provides a modern user experience.

Conclusion

Choosing the right display is a multifaceted decision involving a balance of display technology (LCD vs. OLED), interface speed (I2C vs. SPI vs. Parallel), physical size, and touch capability (Resistive vs. Capacitive). By aligning these factors with the resources of your chosen microcontroller—Arduino, ESP32, STM32, or Raspberry Pi—you can select the perfect Waveshare module to bring your project's visual interface to life.
Back to blog